CQWW CW Results
CQWW CW Results avatar

I was only able to put in about 5 hours but had fun doing what I did. Here is the summary of my results…

CQWWCW Summary Sheet

CallSign Used : K3IU

Operator Category : SINGLE-OP
Assisted Category : NON-ASSISTED
Band : ALL
Power : HIGH
Mode : CW

Club/Team : CTRI Contest Group

Band QSOs Pts ZN Cty
7 21 50 14 13
14 162 474 12 49
21 35 97 11 24
Total 218 621 37 86

Score : 76,383

One comment on “CQWW CW Results
CQWW CW Results avatar

  1. K1SX SOAB(A) LP

    Band QSOs Pts ZN Cty Pt/Q
    1.8 27 59 8 11 2.2
    3.5 11 26 7 10 2.4
    7 131 362 15 54 2.8
    14 161 480 12 56 3.0
    21 42 116 11 27 2.8
    28 3 6 3 3 2.0
    Total 375 1049 56 161 2.8
    Score: 227,633
    12 hours
    G11 SDR to 100 watt homebrew brick amp, 66′ doublet at 50′, inv L with 16 radials for 160

    First, Charlie K1ECU and I did NOT coordinate our scores :). This was my first WW with 100 or so watts on most bands, and it was kind of pasted together–part science experiment (can the amp take it?), part pursuing countries on 160, generally spending too much time on weak signals, trying to run (I couldn’t), and sometimes getting a good cw rush when I got heard and the rate was high. The amp only got lukewarm, no fan needed, and nothing blew up. Signals were very loud on 40 and 20. As usual, the day after I wonder why I didn’t make better use of the spots? (As Charlie did!) I did get a bit of the 10 meter opening–my 3 q’s were zone 35 & 38 and a local, despite no solar flux and a mediocre wire. Another surprise was writing HB9AMO on my pad for a weak call mixed up in the FT8 segment, but really thinking it was a “5” not H, and what do you know…it was, and the B was a U. Summary, it was a lot more fun than 5 watts even if I’m way down in the middle of the results. — Dave K1SX

Comments are closed.